Elsevier

World Development

Volume 134, October 2020, 105038
World Development

Estimating the nutritional loss and the feeding potential derived from food losses worldwide

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105038Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Nutritional Loss and Waste (NLS) represents the nutritional potential derived from food loss and waste;

  • Feeding potential (FP) is the number of adult individuals that could be fed with food losses;

  • World’s food production is increasing, and the rate of food losses follows this grow;

  • World’s food losses in 2017 would be enough to feed about 940 million adult individuals;

  • Investigations on nutritional production and waste can help to promote global food security.

Abstract

This study, focused on the concept of nutritional loss and waste (NLW), aimed to estimate the nutritional losses derived from food losses worldwide, estimating the number of people that could be fed with the amount of food loss worldwide, and confronting such estimate with the prevalence of undernourished people worldwide. We analyzed data on the estimated amount of food losses, considering different food types in nations worldwide, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The investigation estimated the amounts of kilocalories and proteins for each food item available in the FAO’s Food Balance Sheets. Data regarding energy and protein losses were converted into the feeding potential (FP) metric that evaluates the number of adult individuals that could be fed with the nutritional losses. The study uses the balance of feeding potential (BFP) obtained through the FP minus the prevalence of undernourished population. The results show that the total production of the main food groups in the world has drastically increased in the last decades, and the rate of loss for such food groups remains constant or slightly growing. Moreover, the results suggest that the amount of food losses registered by the FAO in 2017 would be enough to feed about 940 million adult individuals, being enough to feed the amount of undernourished people in the world. Furthermore, some countries present high levels of BFP, such as the United States, Brazil and China. In contrast, some other countries, such as India and Pakistan, show lower levels of BFP. Policymakers and private sector agents involved in global food systems should be focusing their attention on increasing supply chain efficiency and reducing food loss and waste (FLW) and NLW on a global scale. This study encourages the definition of an international treaty committing nations to significantly reduce their FLW and NLW levels.

Introduction

Food security is defined as a situation that exists when “all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy lifestyle” (FAO, 2003). And to achieve food security it is necessary to fulfill four conditions simultaneously: (1) physical availability of food; (2) economic and physical access to food; (3) food utilization; and (4) stability of the other three dimensions over time (FAO, 2008).

Despite efforts at the global level, food insecurity still severely affects nations worldwide. Indeed, the FAO estimated that by 2016, about 795 million people were suffering from hunger, and 98% of them was concentrated in developing countries(FAO, 2018). In addition, considering population growth and the growing demand for food (Floros et al., 2010, Godfray et al., 2010), activities associated with food production relate to high environmental impacts, aggravating climate change and damaging the environment (P. Smith and Gregory, 2013, Tilman et al., 2002, Tilman and Clark, 2014).

In this scenario, the high level of food loss and waste (FLW) in the world directly affects the conditions for promoting food security on a global scale (Parfitt, Barthel, & Macnaughton, 2010). Food loss occurs throughout the supply chains, from primary production to final household consumption level. On the other hand, food waste is part of food loss and refers to discarding or alternative (non-food) use of food that is safe and nutritious for human consumption along the entire food supply chain, from primary production to end household consumer level (FAO, 2019).

Regarding this, the FAO estimates that about one-third of all food produced in the world is lost during the production process or consumption (FAO, 2011, FAO, 2018). Converting such a loss into calories, the result suggests that for every four calories destined for consumption, one is lost (Lipinski, Hanson, Lomax, Kitinoja, Waite, & Searchinger, 2013a), and these losses occur at several levels and occasions in the supply and consumption chain (Corrado and Sala, 2018, Ju et al., 2017, Parfitt et al., 2010). Converting FLW into nutritional loss and waste (NLW), it is possible to estimate the nutritional potential associated with the FLW, as well as the number of people that could be fed with such waste. Thus, NLW is defined as the nutritional potential, regarding macronutrients and micronutrients, derived from the FLW.

FLW has implications in waste of important productive and environmental resources (e.g. water, land, energy, workforce) (De Menna, Dietershagen, Loubiere, & Vittuari, 2018; M. Kummu, de Moel, Porkka, Siebert, Varis, & Ward, 2012), and has potential implications for food prices dynamics (Huffaker, Canavari, & Muñoz-Carpena, 2018). Evidence shows that FLW occurs in all stages of the food supply chain (Abass et al., 2014, Kazancoglu et al., 2018, Yang et al., 2019), and is associated with waste of important natural and economic resources, such as water, land, monetary investments, fertilizers, pesticides, labor work force, and energy (Kibler et al., 2018, Woon et al., 2016). Reducing FLW worldwide becomes a global challenge in order to promote food security worldwide and reduce environmental pressures, such as greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions, climate change and hydric stresses (Garcia-Herrero et al., 2018, Irani et al., 2018).

The NLW represents the nutritional potential derived from FLW. Hence, this study aims to estimate the NLW derived from the FLW registered worldwide, analyzing the loss of nutritional potential associated with food losses worldwide. Also, this study aims to estimate the number of people that could be fed with the amount of food lost worldwide by confronting such estimate with the prevalence of undernourished people worldwide. This research also suggests a methodological approach with the purpose of converting the FLW into a nutritional waste-generating metric that allows evaluating the nutritional potential in the number of people derived from the amount of food produced and/or wasted.

Section snippets

Method

This ecological study utilizes data on the estimated amount of food loss registered in nations worldwide published by the FAO. The study obtained data regarding the quantity of different types of food loss in the world’s nations. Secondly, the investigation estimated the amounts of kilocalories and proteins for each type of food category available in the FAO database. For this purpose, the study used the FAO's estimate for food types regarding kilocalories and proteins amounts by observing the

Results

Considering the problem of FLW worldwide, data provided by the FAO demonstrate that although the production of the main food groups has sharply increased in recent years, a level of waste accompanies it. This suggests that natural resources and production factors employed in the effort to increase food production end up being wasted. Fig. 1 shows the evolution of the quantity produced and the respective percentage loss of the main food groups from 1961 to 2017.

World food production is

Discussion

FLW, and the consequent NLW, is one of the major social and economic problems that threatens the world's sustainability and undermines the achievement of important sustainable development goals (Principato, Ruini, Guidi, & Secondi, 2019). The scarcity and inefficient use of natural resources has severe implications in terms of environmental impacts that threaten the world’s condition to promote food security (Coumou and Rahmstorf, 2012, Foley et al., 2011, Hoekstra and Mekonnen, 2012, Kummu et

Conclusion

This study has provided evidence to suggest that the amount and type of food losses in the world is nutritionally sufficient to meet the demands of undernourished populations in the world, generating surpluses. Therefore, the world’s food production is sufficient to meet population nutritional demands worldwide. Nevertheless, the focus is still on increasing agri-food production when more attention should be paid to increasing supply chain efficiency and reducing FLW and NLW in food systems on

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Eduardo Botti Abbade: Writing - original draft.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the research funding agencie FAPERGS for the financial support granted.

References (75)

  • K. Grönman et al.

    Nutrient footprint as a tool to evaluate the nutrient balance of a food chain

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2016)
  • M.M. Gutierrez et al.

    Food losses, shelf life extension and environmental impact of a packaged cheesecake: A life cycle assessment

    Food Research International

    (2017)
  • R. Huffaker et al.

    Distinguishing between endogenous and exogenous price volatility in food security assessment: An empirical nonlinear dynamics approach

    Agricultural Systems

    (2018)
  • M. Ju et al.

    Food loss rate in food supply chain using material flow analysis

    Waste Management

    (2017)
  • Y. Kazancoglu et al.

    Minimizing losses in milk supply chain with sustainability: An example from an emerging economy

    Resources, Conservation and Recycling

    (2018)
  • K.M. Kibler et al.

    Food waste and the food-energy-water nexus: A review of food waste management alternatives

    Waste Management

    (2018)
  • Matti Kummu et al.

    Bringing it all together: Linking measures to secure nations’ food supply

    Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

    (2017)
  • M.S. Meier et al.

    Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products–Are the differences captured by life cycle assessment?

    Journal of Environmental Management

    (2015)
  • B.D.D. Miller et al.

    Food system strategies for preventing micronutrient malnutrition

    Food Policy

    (2013)
  • P. Nestel et al.

    Biofortification of Staple Food Crops

    The Journal of Nutrition

    (2006)
  • B. Notarnicola et al.

    The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2017)
  • S. Plazzotta et al.

    Fruit and vegetable waste management and the challenge of fresh-cut salad

    Trends in Food Science & Technology

    (2017)
  • L. Principato et al.

    Adopting the circular economy approach on food loss and waste: The case of Italian pasta production

    Resources, Conservation and Recycling

    (2019)
  • L. Secondi et al.

    Household food waste behaviour in EU-27 countries: A multilevel analysis

    Food Policy

    (2015)
  • A. Spada et al.

    The influence of shelf life on food waste: A model-based approach by empirical market evidence

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2018)
  • H. Williams et al.

    Reasons for household food waste with special attention to packaging

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2012)
  • K.S. Woon et al.

    Environmental assessment of food waste valorization in producing biogas for various types of energy use based on LCA approach

    Waste Management

    (2016)
  • E.B. Abbade

    Environmental impacts of food supply and obesogenic severity worldwide

    British Food Journal

    (2015)
  • E.B. Abbade et al.

    Brazilian dry-beans and food security in developing countries

    Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies

    (2014)
  • J. Aschemann-Witzel et al.

    Consumer-related food waste: Role of food marketing and retailers and potential for action

    Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing

    (2016)
  • Bouis, H. E., Hotz, C., McClafferty, B., Meenakshi, J. V., & Pfeiffer, W. H. (2011). Biofortification: A New Tool to...
  • D. Coumou et al.

    A decade of weather extremes

    Nature Climate Change

    (2012)
  • B. Devin et al.

    Food Waste, Power, and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Australian Food Supply Chain

    Journal of Business Ethics

    (2018)
  • FAO. (2008). An introduction to the basic concepts of food security. Food Security Information for Action. Practical...
  • FAO. (2011). Global food losses and food waste–Extent, causes and prevention. SAVE FOOD: An Initiative on Food Loss and...
  • FAO. (2014). SOFI 2013 - The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World....
  • FAO. (2018). SOFI 2018 - The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World. Www.Fao.Org....
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text