Estimating the nutritional loss and the feeding potential derived from food losses worldwide
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Food security is defined as a situation that exists when “all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy lifestyle” (FAO, 2003). And to achieve food security it is necessary to fulfill four conditions simultaneously: (1) physical availability of food; (2) economic and physical access to food; (3) food utilization; and (4) stability of the other three dimensions over time (FAO, 2008).
Despite efforts at the global level, food insecurity still severely affects nations worldwide. Indeed, the FAO estimated that by 2016, about 795 million people were suffering from hunger, and 98% of them was concentrated in developing countries(FAO, 2018). In addition, considering population growth and the growing demand for food (Floros et al., 2010, Godfray et al., 2010), activities associated with food production relate to high environmental impacts, aggravating climate change and damaging the environment (P. Smith and Gregory, 2013, Tilman et al., 2002, Tilman and Clark, 2014).
In this scenario, the high level of food loss and waste (FLW) in the world directly affects the conditions for promoting food security on a global scale (Parfitt, Barthel, & Macnaughton, 2010). Food loss occurs throughout the supply chains, from primary production to final household consumption level. On the other hand, food waste is part of food loss and refers to discarding or alternative (non-food) use of food that is safe and nutritious for human consumption along the entire food supply chain, from primary production to end household consumer level (FAO, 2019).
Regarding this, the FAO estimates that about one-third of all food produced in the world is lost during the production process or consumption (FAO, 2011, FAO, 2018). Converting such a loss into calories, the result suggests that for every four calories destined for consumption, one is lost (Lipinski, Hanson, Lomax, Kitinoja, Waite, & Searchinger, 2013a), and these losses occur at several levels and occasions in the supply and consumption chain (Corrado and Sala, 2018, Ju et al., 2017, Parfitt et al., 2010). Converting FLW into nutritional loss and waste (NLW), it is possible to estimate the nutritional potential associated with the FLW, as well as the number of people that could be fed with such waste. Thus, NLW is defined as the nutritional potential, regarding macronutrients and micronutrients, derived from the FLW.
FLW has implications in waste of important productive and environmental resources (e.g. water, land, energy, workforce) (De Menna, Dietershagen, Loubiere, & Vittuari, 2018; M. Kummu, de Moel, Porkka, Siebert, Varis, & Ward, 2012), and has potential implications for food prices dynamics (Huffaker, Canavari, & Muñoz-Carpena, 2018). Evidence shows that FLW occurs in all stages of the food supply chain (Abass et al., 2014, Kazancoglu et al., 2018, Yang et al., 2019), and is associated with waste of important natural and economic resources, such as water, land, monetary investments, fertilizers, pesticides, labor work force, and energy (Kibler et al., 2018, Woon et al., 2016). Reducing FLW worldwide becomes a global challenge in order to promote food security worldwide and reduce environmental pressures, such as greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions, climate change and hydric stresses (Garcia-Herrero et al., 2018, Irani et al., 2018).
The NLW represents the nutritional potential derived from FLW. Hence, this study aims to estimate the NLW derived from the FLW registered worldwide, analyzing the loss of nutritional potential associated with food losses worldwide. Also, this study aims to estimate the number of people that could be fed with the amount of food lost worldwide by confronting such estimate with the prevalence of undernourished people worldwide. This research also suggests a methodological approach with the purpose of converting the FLW into a nutritional waste-generating metric that allows evaluating the nutritional potential in the number of people derived from the amount of food produced and/or wasted.
Section snippets
Method
This ecological study utilizes data on the estimated amount of food loss registered in nations worldwide published by the FAO. The study obtained data regarding the quantity of different types of food loss in the world’s nations. Secondly, the investigation estimated the amounts of kilocalories and proteins for each type of food category available in the FAO database. For this purpose, the study used the FAO's estimate for food types regarding kilocalories and proteins amounts by observing the
Results
Considering the problem of FLW worldwide, data provided by the FAO demonstrate that although the production of the main food groups has sharply increased in recent years, a level of waste accompanies it. This suggests that natural resources and production factors employed in the effort to increase food production end up being wasted. Fig. 1 shows the evolution of the quantity produced and the respective percentage loss of the main food groups from 1961 to 2017.
World food production is
Discussion
FLW, and the consequent NLW, is one of the major social and economic problems that threatens the world's sustainability and undermines the achievement of important sustainable development goals (Principato, Ruini, Guidi, & Secondi, 2019). The scarcity and inefficient use of natural resources has severe implications in terms of environmental impacts that threaten the world’s condition to promote food security (Coumou and Rahmstorf, 2012, Foley et al., 2011, Hoekstra and Mekonnen, 2012, Kummu et
Conclusion
This study has provided evidence to suggest that the amount and type of food losses in the world is nutritionally sufficient to meet the demands of undernourished populations in the world, generating surpluses. Therefore, the world’s food production is sufficient to meet population nutritional demands worldwide. Nevertheless, the focus is still on increasing agri-food production when more attention should be paid to increasing supply chain efficiency and reducing FLW and NLW in food systems on
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Eduardo Botti Abbade: Writing - original draft.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the research funding agencie FAPERGS for the financial support granted.
References (75)
- et al.
Post-harvest food losses in a maize-based farming system of semi-arid savannah area of Tanzania
Journal of Stored Products Research
(2014) - et al.
Life cycle assessment of macroalgae cultivation and processing for biofuel production
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2014) - et al.
Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
(2015) - et al.
Role of food processing in food and nutrition security
Trends in Food Science & Technology
(2016) - et al.
Improving nutrition through biofortification: A review of evidence from HarvestPlus, 2003 through 2016
Global Food Security
(2017) - et al.
Life cycle assessment application in the fruit sector: State of the art and recommendations for environmental declarations of fruit products
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2014) - et al.
Food waste accounting along global and European food supply chains: State of the art and outlook
Waste Management
(2018) - et al.
Life cycle costing of food waste: A review of methodological approaches
Waste Management
(2018) - et al.
On the estimation of potential food waste reduction to support sustainable production and consumption policies
Food Policy
(2018) - et al.
The environmental cost of subsistence: Optimizing diets to minimize footprints
Science of The Total Environment
(2016)